If you secretly despise wealth, it will elude you.—
Naval Ravikant
Most people claim to hate money and say that they don’t want to be rich because money is the source of all evils —Yada, Yada….CONTINUE READING HERE
But I call BS on that.
I believe that this is just a subconscious defense mechanism people have developed so that they don’t have to accept the hard truth — that they simply
don’t know how to build wealth.
Hence, if you truly want to be rich —
Go on. Do all three. I’ll wait. Done? So fast? Great.
You’re now ready to learn the incredible wealth-building ideas
of entrepreneur and investor Naval Ravikant
and have your financial mind rewired forever. Let’s dive in.
Give me a place to stand, and a lever long enough, and I will move the world.
— Archimedes
Leverage is basically anything that allows you to multiply your efforts. For instance, a writer has to write a book only once, and then, it can be printed repeatedly for decades for people to read. This way, the printing press acts as a leverage that allows a writer’s efforts to be multiplied.
While a printing press is a specific example of a lever, broadly classified, Naval says there are two kinds of leverage:
I: Permissioned leverage. This, again, has two types.
Capital and
People working for you.
Because while both allow you to multiply your efforts, they might need someone else’s permission. To raise capital, you need to convince someone to invest their hard-earned money in you and to get people to work for you, you again
have to convince them to work for you
by paying them a decent salary.
II: Permissionless leverage is the kind of leverage that Naval says is responsible for the newly rich. This kind is very powerful because you don’t need someone’s permission to use these levers to multiply your efforts. This, again, has two types.
Code.
And Media like blog posts, youtube videos, podcasts, music, etc.
For instance, with code, a person can build an application all by themself that solves problems for many people and put it into the app store for the world to purchase. Or, a creator can shoot Youtube videos for free and slowly start to monetize them. In both cases, starting out is easy even if you have no money — because you don’t need anyone else’s permission.
I have realized the power of permissionless leverage in my own life. I started as a writer from zero. I hadn’t made a penny in life before starting to write. But over time, I began to consistently make four figures every month while working less than 25 hours per month.
As of now, the idea of Permissioned and Permissionless leverage have allowed me to create a roadmap to building wealth in my own life. If you’re starting out your own journey, I highly recommend you do the same.
Start out your journey by using permissionless leverage because it allows you to enter the game quickly. This means you should either use code or media to start multiplying your efforts. If you’re like me and you can’t code, start by writing online (on Medium, Twitter, or LinkedIn) or recording YouTube videos. Build an audience, gain their trust, and maybe start selling digital products on Gumroad. Save money and build enough capital.
Later, use that capital to hire coders or other experts to start other businesses. This way, you’re using capital — but your own capital — which makes it Permissionless in a way.
Simply put, my plan is to eventually use all four levers — media, code, capital, and humans — to build my wealth.
For a majority of the population, it’s etched in their brains that renting out their time is the only way to make money. For instance, the way to make money for them is to
work 9–5
for 24 days a month, and in the end, they get a salary. The salary may be high or low, depending on their jobs. But in essence, they’re making money by renting out their time.
Because their output (money they make) is heavily linked to their input (time they put in). They don’t make a penny if they don’t work for a month.
This method of making money can never allow you to be rich because even if your hourly rate is high (as in the case of doctors and lawyers), the number of hours you can work is limited. You cannot work more than 10–12 hours a day. And that means the most money you can make in a day is 12 times your hourly rate. Simply put, there’s a ceiling.
To build wealth, you need to find a way to make money where your output is not so heavily linked to your input. This is essentially how businesses work. Once you get it going, even if you take a month off work, you still continue to make more or less the same amount of money. Meaning, you earn with your mind and your decisions, not with your time.
And let me tell you — the difference between these two ways of making money is extraordinary. Not just because of the amount of money you make, but the kind of freedom you feel in the latter way. Take it from me — I make money in both ways.
The freedom of not having to work compulsorily and still having money coming in every month is extraordinary. It takes so much pressure off of you. That’s why you must start figuring out ways to make money where you don’t have to rent out your time. I mean, yes, you’ll still have to work, but the output must not be directly proportional to your input. Trust me, your future self will thank you for it.
A lot of my batchmates, friends, and acquaintances
work so freaking hard in life
. It’s inspiring, really. But then, they don’t make nearly as much money as I do. And that’s so *** sad.
I know, that sounds braggy, but I’m not bragging. I’m just trying to prove a point.
What you work on and who you work with are far more important than how hard you work. Let’s tackle the quote in parts:
The importance of what you work on:
A lot of my friends have jobs. They have to work 25 days a month for several hours a day, and they might earn somewhere around 1500 dollars. And this is actually a good income in India.
However, I can easily make the same amount of money as a writer, even if I don’t work at all in a month. And if I work just 25 hours a month (not 25 days), I can earn 2–4 times the given amount.
What’s the difference here? I’m not particularly smarter than them. I’m not more talented than them. I’m not more skillful than them. The reason is simply that WHAT I’m working on is much more powerful than what they’re working on.
The creator economy is experiencing an incredible high. And because I’m working as a creator, I get to reap the benefits even if I’m not working incredibly hard.
Now let’s talk about the other part of the quote.
The importance of who you work with:
Watching Suits is my guilty pleasure. I sometimes hate myself for watching a show so overly dramatic — and even ask myself, “What the *** I’m doing?!” but I still watch it.
In one episode, an evil billionaire by the name of Charles Forstman offers Harvey Specter — the protagonist lawyer of the show — a job. Harvey declines, saying that he doesn’t want to work for him and that he’ll soon be making half a million dollars annually anyway.
To which, Charles Forstman says, “Half a million dollars is ***. My Gardner makes that.” Harvey replies, “Then go offer your Gardner a job because I’m not interested.”
Good repartee, but there’s a point to be observed here.
Harvey Specter is a lawyer from Harvard — and we can assume that takes a lot of hard work. But then, Charles Fortman’s gardener — a job that takes less work to master than learning the law — makes a lot more money than him. Why?
Simply because WHO you’re working for is again, much more important than how hard you work. Of course, I’m not suggesting that one should work for evil billionaires. But just pointing out that who you’re associated with matters a lot as well.
I haven’t yet reaped the benefits of this tangent of Naval’s quote. But I plan to do it soon. In India, there are a lot of famous doctors who have managed to build incredible audiences online. My plan is to approach them soon with opportunities — like ghostwriting books or blog posts for them — and see what comes of it. The principle here is simple — figure out the needs of rich and influential people, and then figure out how to quench those needs. I’m sure that’ll yield great benefits.
So while hard work is celebrated in today’s world a lot, it’s not the most important thing. Because trust me, mediocre work in the right direction is going to help you much more than hard work in the wrong direction. Therefore, take some time out to figure out what you should work on, and who you should work with before you start hustling your a** off only to be disappointed with the results.
To get rich, you need society to pay you. To get them to pay you, you need to give them what they want. To give them what they want, you have to figure out what society wants.
And hence, while building your wealth is actually a pretty messy and complex journey, it can be simplified into two key steps. Let me explain with the help of an example.
Figure out what society wants. For example, Steve Jobs realized that people would want phones as powerful as computers in their hands.
Give it to them at scale. (Scale using leverage — permissionless or permission.) Then Steve Jobs gave society what it wanted at scale by launching iPhones. He used leverage mostly in the form of capital and humans to multiply his efforts.
That’s why Steve Jobs was rich. However, Steve scaled his efforts mostly using capital and humans — both forms of Permissioned leverage.
But take the
example of this woman
who made $280k on Etsy selling spreadsheets. In her article, she said that she realized that people would want spreadsheets to simplify their life. She thought of and created those spreadsheets only once — and then scaled her efforts using digital products’ power as permissionless leverage.
Powerful, right?
You can use either Permissioned or permissionless leverage, whatever works for you. But to get rich, you have to figure out what society wants and then give it to them — at scale.
Tying it all together
Akshad Singi, M.D. has been published in Better Humans, Mind Cafe, and more.
This article was originally published at
Medum. Reprinted with permission from the author….CONTINUE READING HERE
