JUST IN: Labour Party: A/Court Fines Apapa’s Allies, Reverses Restraining Order On Abure

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja on Wednesday, reversed the decision of the FCT High Court, which dismissed the objection raised by Barr Julius Abure challenging the restraining order on him acting as chairman of the Labour Party (LP)<<<READ FULL ARTICLE>>>

It will be recalled that Justice Hamza Muazu of the FCT High Court, Abuja on May 13, 2023, dismissed the preliminary objection by Abure after a rulling on an ex-parte application which restrained him and three others; Farouk Ibrahim, Clement Ojukwu, and Oluchi Opara, from acting as national executives of the party.

PAY ATTENTION:  Drama as community and family members allegedly battle over Junior Pope’s body, community insists he must be buried in the river

BREAKING: Borrow $30bn From IMF To Save Nigeria’s Economy, Ex-CBN Deputy Governor, Moghalu Advises FG

The suit marked CV/2930/2023 was instituted by Martins Esikpali John, Lucky Shaibu, Isah Zekeri, Omogbai Frank, Abokhaiu Aliu, Ayohkaire Lateef, John Elomah and Ayobami Arabambi.

The plaintiffs told the court that the defendants forged several documents of the court to carry out unlawful substitutions in the last elections.

PAY ATTENTION:  JUST IN: Abandoned Corpse: Imo Specialist Hospital Organizes Mass Burial In Owerri

Abure through his lawyer, Alex Ejesieme, filed a preliminary objection against the suit, saying that an allegation of forgery against his clients cannot be brought before the court by way of an originating summon.

Ejesieme alleged that the plaintiffs are not members of the LP and therefore, lack the locus standi to institute the suit, adding that the matter borders on the internal issues of the party which the court cannot interfere with.

BREAKING: Chike Obi: The First Nigerian to hold a Doctorate degree in Mathematics, drop a like for a true Nigerian legend

PAY ATTENTION:  BREAKING: EFCC has adjusted its blunder, now claims Bello stole N80b within first three weeks in office — Media Office

Justice Muazu held that the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter even though it relates to the party’s internal affairs, as there would have no need to interfere, had the party been at peace.

He added that the plaintiffs were right to have instituted the case by originating summons and subsequently restrained Abure and his executives from acting as National officers of the party<<<READ FULL ARTICLE>>>