Despite the military’s efforts to degrade the capabilities of ISWAP and Boko Haram, the recent attacks highlight persistent vulnerabilities.>>>CONTINUE FULL READING HERE....CONTINUE READING THE ARTICLE FROM THE SOURCE
According to Vanguard, former Chief of Training, Operations and Plans at the Defence Headquarters (DHQ), General Ishola Williams (retired), analyzed the situation, noting potential loopholes exploited by the bombers and discussing why insurgency seems unending in Borno State.
With the resurgence of suicide bombers, Williams suggests a possible shift in strategy by Boko Haram following their purported defeat. He questions the effectiveness of current tactics, emphasizing that Nigeria has not truly won the war against Boko Haram. According to him, insurgents capitalize on weaknesses in the intelligence system, recycling their attacks after periods of inactivity.
Williams observes that Boko Haram and ISWAP do not operate similarly in neighboring countries like Chad, Cameroon, or Niger, implying superior intelligence systems in those regions. He recounts how
Boko Haram‘s late leader instructed fighters to avoid Chad, focusing instead on Nigeria. This fear of the Chadian army, contrasted with a lack of fear for the Nigerian army, underscores the need for tactical changes.>>>CONTINUE FULL READING HERE
He said, “I don’t think we have ever won the war on Boko Haram. What we see is the recycling of insurgency. They take a break; after sometime, when they see some weaknesses on the part of the intelligence system, they return with their attacks. There is something people haven’t bothered to notice.
Boko Haram and ISWAP don’t do what they do in Nigeria in Chad, Cameroon or in Niger. Why? Is it because their intelligence system is better than our own? And Boko Haram leader, before he died, told Chadians to stop attacking them and that they were not interested in attacking Chad.”
Senator Jimoh Ibrahim echoes this sentiment, urging the military to adapt its strategies.
Williams criticizes the continued investment in sophisticated but unnecessary equipment, advocating for a change in operational approach and the adoption of appropriate equipment and structures to effectively combat insurgency.
Despite the military’s efforts to degrade the capabilities of ISWAP and Boko Haram, the recent attacks highlight persistent vulnerabilities.
According to Vanguard, former Chief of Training, Operations and Plans at the Defence Headquarters (DHQ), General Ishola Williams (retired), analyzed the situation, noting potential loopholes exploited by the bombers and discussing why insurgency seems unending in Borno State.
With the resurgence of suicide bombers, Williams suggests a possible shift in strategy by Boko Haram following their purported defeat. He questions the effectiveness of current tactics, emphasizing that Nigeria has not truly won the war against Boko Haram. According to him, insurgents capitalize on weaknesses in the intelligence system, recycling their attacks after periods of inactivity.
Williams observes that Boko Haram and ISWAP do not operate similarly in neighboring countries like Chad, Cameroon, or Niger, implying superior intelligence systems in those regions. He recounts how Boko Haram‘s late leader instructed fighters to avoid Chad, focusing instead on Nigeria. This fear of the Chadian army, contrasted with a lack of fear for the Nigerian army, underscores the need for tactical changes.
He said, “I don’t think we have ever won the war on Boko Haram. What we see is the recycling of insurgency. They take a break; after sometime, when they see some weaknesses on the part of the intelligence system, they return with their attacks. There is something people haven’t bothered to notice.
Boko Haram and ISWAP don’t do what they do in Nigeria in Chad, Cameroon or in Niger. Why? Is it because their intelligence system is better than our own? And Boko Haram leader, before he died, told Chadians to stop attacking them and that they were not interested in attacking Chad.”
Senator Jimoh Ibrahim echoes this sentiment, urging the military to adapt its strategies.
Williams criticizes the continued investment in sophisticated but unnecessary equipment, advocating for a change in operational approach and the adoption of appropriate equipment and structures to effectively combat insurgency.>>>CONTINUE FULL READING HERE
