BEIJING – China has said it is deeply concerned over Iran’s strike on Israel on April 14, but stopped short of condemning the attack; instead, it described it a “spillover of the conflict in Gaza”.READ FULL ARTICLE HERE>>>>
While a multitude of countries, including Japan, Denmark, Mexico and Singapore, have immediately censured the drone and missile strikes on Israeli territory – which Iran says is payback for an April 1 bombing of its consulate in Syria – Beijing has held back on criticising its important strategic partner.
The two countries have forged close economic and strategic ties in recent years, with China buying as much as 90 per cent of US-sanctioned Iranian crude oil in 2023 at discounted prices, making it Iran’s biggest trading partner.
Last year, China also brokered a high-profile deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore diplomatic ties after years of hostilities, as it continues to seek to expand its presence and influence in the Middle East.
BREAKING: Biafra will assist Israel with 15,000 Troops – Simon Ekpa
In contrast, Beijing had earlier condemned Israel’s suspected strike on the Iranian consulate, and it also called the United States to play a “constructive role” in resolving the Gaza conflict.
The lack of a denunciation by Beijing over the violence shows that it considers Tehran’s actions a legitimate response, said Mr Ahmed Aboudouh, associate fellow at London-based think-tank Chatham House.
“However, overall, China is unlikely to take significant steps that may undermine its relations with either Iran or Israel as long as its commercial and political interests are not directly affected,” said Mr Ahmed, who is also head of China Studies at the Emirates Policy Centre, a think-tank in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates.
ST Asian Insider: Malaysia Edition
Get exclusive insights into Malaysia in weekly round-up
Sign up
By signing up, I accept SPH Media’s Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.
Yes, I would also like to receive SPH Media Group’s SPH Media Limited, its related corporations and affiliates as well as their agents and authorised service providers.
marketing and promotions.
“The only opportunity this escalation may create for Beijing is to blame the US’ mild pressure on Israel to stop the war in Gaza.”
Since the start of the Gaza crisis, China has advocated for the Palestinian cause, emphasising that a two-state solution is the only way to end the conflict between Israel and Palestine.
It has repeatedly called for a ceasefire, but has avoided condemning Hamas for its surprise Oct 7 attack on Israel.
“So far, the PRC has been publicly quite hands-off regarding the conflict in Gaza. They have issued statements calling for peace, criticising Israel, and expressing support for Palestine. Action has been less evident,” said Associate Professor Chong Ja Ian at the National University of Singapore, referring to the People’s Republic of China by its acronym.
Similarly, Beijing has also been advocating for peace in Yemen – which has been besieged by a civil war for the past decade – but refrained from denouncing the country’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels from attacking commercial ships in the Red Sea since November.
“This relatively quiet approach reflects both the complicated situation facing Beijing and its limited leverage in the region,” said Prof Chong, an international relations specialist with a focus on Chinese foreign policy.
Iran’s attack on Israel was calibrated to minimise damage, say analysts. But what next?
A proxy war between Israel and Iran is over, and the dangers will only grow
Even so, the US and other western countries had urged China to use its sway with Iran to prevent a retaliatory attack and an escalation of tensions after Tehran vowed retribution for the consulate attack.
“I suspect the US already understands the limits of China’s leverage over Iran and the lack of desire in Beijing to support Washington’s strategic preferences towards the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict,” said Mr Ahmed.
“I think by repeating that it continues to reach out to China to help curb Iran and its proxies’ actions, the Biden administration seeks to demonstrate it didn’t leave any stone unturned and draw what it considers China’s inaction and self-interested approach under the spotlight,” he added.
“The ultimate objective is to promote to the regional countries the narrative that Beijing is an unreliable partner and that the US is the only security principal that guarantees regional security.”
China’s other considerations
Chinese supply chains and energy imports could be at stake if there was wider instability in the Middle East, putting further strain on the Chinese economy; a situation that Beijing would want to avoid, said Prof Chong.
“Beijing also wishes to maintain positive ties with the Arab states and Iran due to these considerations. As a result, it probably wants to avoid behaviour that could seem less supportive to these actors, including acts like publicly criticising or putting pressure on Tehran,” he said.
“How much Beijing can really restrain a partner like Iran is also unclear, especially on issues that Tehran deems important.”
BREAKING: “Ways Israel Can Address Iran’s Aggressive Actions”
As a result, China is expected to stick to its risk-averse, balancing policy while dealing with Iran and Israel, said Mr Ahmed.
“This is aligned with Beijing’s concern that if the ‘spillover’ reaches the Gulf region, it may unravel the China-sponsored diplomatic thaw between Iran and Saudi Arabia,” he said.
Mr Ahmed was referring to the possibility of Israel targeting Iranian interests in the Hormuz Strait, a narrow but vital waterway between Iran and Oman that is the most important oil passage in the world; or a US strike from its military bases in the Gulf which could trigger an Iranian response.
“I suspect this is the biggest concern Chinese officials are considering right now.”.READ FULL ARTICLE HERE>>>>
