A wave of controversy has followed allegations involving a 66-year-old Chief Medical Director, Doctor Elizabeth Robert, over an incident reported at a hospital in Port Harcourt.
Addressing the situation, the medical director denied any wrongdoing, insisting that her actions were aimed at assisting families seeking children. Her response comes amid growing public concern over claims relating to the sale of a baby and the handling of a deceased infant.
Something May Be Affecting Your Progress — Or You May Just Need CLarity; Not every situation is physical. Sometimes what is needed is deeper spiritual clarity, direction, balance in life, and if you are seeking clarity in relationships, health, finances, leadership, or success, a confidential spiritual consultation may provide insight, strategic direction, stability, and confidence for forward progress. WhatsApp: 07062156834 Dr Adams Adam Spiritual Space. With God, all things are possible.
According to her account, the process involved women who voluntarily gave up their babies, after which arrangements were made to transfer the children to other individuals through a woman she described as a social welfare agent. She maintained that the actions were carried out with consent.
In her words, she offered a detailed explanation of the events, stating, “I sold the baby for ₦3 million and gave ₦2.5 million to a welfare agent for logistics. There was no wrongdoing. The dead child was a result of a miscarriage. The husband was not around, so we contacted him and informed him of what happened. He consented to the disposal, and I charged him. However, the baby was not disposed of as planned.”
Her statement has since drawn widespread attention, particularly due to the mention of financial transactions, the involvement of a supposed welfare agent, and the circumstances surrounding the deceased infant.
Observers say the claims raise serious ethical and legal questions, with many calling for a thorough investigation into the matter. For some, the situation points to potential gaps in oversight within informal or unregulated child welfare arrangements.
The development has also highlighted the vulnerability of individuals in desperate situations, including women facing difficult choices and families seeking children, who may become involved in processes lacking proper regulation.
Public reaction has been swift, with many expressing concern over the implications of the allegations, especially given the position of the individual involved within the healthcare system.
As the situation continues to unfold, attention is now focused on how relevant authorities will respond to the claims. For many stakeholders, ensuring accountability and protecting vulnerable individuals remain key priorities.
Ultimately, the incident has sparked a broader conversation about ethics, oversight, and responsibility within medical and social welfare systems. The outcome is expected to have significant implications for public trust and institutional integrity.