According to a report by Punch on Monday, April 13, 2026, former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, has denied allegations of bribery and abuse of office while testifying before a court in the United Kingdom.
The proceedings took place on Monday at Southwark Crown Court, where the former minister appeared as part of an ongoing legal process examining claims related to her time in public office.
The case has drawn attention due to her past role in Nigeria’s oil sector and the seriousness of the allegations being considered by the court.
During her appearance, Alison-Madueke addressed the accusations directly, stating that she did not request or accept any form of bribe in connection with the awarding of government contracts.
She also maintained that her conduct in office was guided by fairness and adherence to official procedures.
The court session focused on reviewing claims that she had used her position to influence decisions in exchange for financial benefits.
Her testimony forms a key part of the legal process, as the court evaluates evidence and statements from various parties involved in the case.
The proceedings are taking place within the broader context of international cooperation on legal and financial investigations, particularly in cases involving public officials and allegations of corruption.
Alison-Madueke, who once held a significant position in Nigeria’s government, has been the subject of multiple investigations over the years.
Her role as Minister of Petroleum Resources placed her at the centre of decisions affecting one of the country’s most important economic sectors, making the case of interest to both Nigerian and international observers.
At the court hearing, attention was given to the processes involved in awarding contracts during her tenure, as well as the mechanisms designed to ensure transparency and accountability in public office.
The prosecution has raised concerns about whether these processes were followed, while the defence has sought to demonstrate that official procedures were adhered to.
Alison-Madueke’s testimony emphasised her position that she acted within the limits of her authority and did not engage in misconduct.
Legal proceedings at Southwark Crown Court are expected to continue as the court reviews further evidence and hears from additional witnesses.
The case involves detailed examination of financial transactions, official communications, and administrative decisions made during the period under review.
The outcome will depend on the court’s assessment of the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence.
She said, “I can state categorically that at no point did I ask for, take or receive a bribe of any sort from these persons and did not abuse my office, I always sought to act impartially.”