In a recent interview on AIT, Senator Adams Oshiomhole intensified his criticism of proposed adjustments to Senate leadership rules, insisting that such moves risk undermining established democratic procedures within the National Assembly.
During the interview, Oshiomhole was quoted as saying, “Akpabio must vacate the Senate as he is presiding without proper qualifications.” He argued that the current conversation around leadership eligibility criteria appears inconsistent when measured against the tenure record of the incumbent Senate President.
According to him, the debate over introducing a minimum number of years of legislative experience for anyone aspiring to preside over the Senate raises fundamental questions of fairness and self-accountability. He maintained that if such a rule were to be applied strictly, it would logically require all current officeholders, including the Senate President, to be evaluated under the same standard.
Oshiomhole further insisted that the Senate should not be seen to be altering its rules in a way that could be interpreted as targeting individuals or limiting competition. He stressed that Nigeria’s legislative institutions must be guided by consistency, transparency, and respect for precedents that have shaped parliamentary leadership over time.
The former Edo State governor also referenced past Senate leadership structures, noting that former Senate President David Mark was able to serve two full terms under the existing rules without controversy. He argued that this history demonstrates that the system, as originally designed, was capable of producing stable leadership without constant amendments driven by political considerations.
He warned that changing foundational rules for short-term political advantage could set a dangerous precedent and weaken public trust in the legislature. Oshiomhole concluded by urging lawmakers to prioritize institutional integrity over personal or factional interests, emphasizing that democratic governance depends on rules that are applied uniformly and not adjusted to suit changing political convenience.